We Analyzed 5,000 Tech Jobs. The Top Skill Wasn’t Python.

We recently analyzed skill requirements across 5,000 recently indexed technical job postings in Seeker's job corpus. We expected programming languages, cloud platforms, or data tools to dominate the list.

They didn't.

The single most frequently requested skill was communication.

What the data shows

Across 5,000 technical job postings indexed between May and June 2026, we extracted every explicitly listed skill requirement and counted how often each appeared. After filtering out generic job description language (benefits, compensation, team size), here are the most frequently requested skills:

| Skill | Job postings |

|---|---|

| Communication | 137 |

| Machine Learning | 91 |

| Cloud Computing | 80 |

| Organization | 80 |

| Platform Engineering | 74 |

| Leadership | 72 |

| Scalability | 71 |

| Account Management | 55 |

| Dashboards | 54 |

| Collaboration | 52 |

| Security | 50 |

| Cross-functional Collaboration | 46 |

| Excel | 45 |

| Software Architecture | 42 |

Communication appeared in 50% more job postings than machine learning (137 vs 91) and nearly twice as often as platform engineering (137 vs 74).

What's not on the list

Notice what's missing from the top of this table. Python, JavaScript, React, SQL, Kubernetes — the skills that dominate most "top tech skills" articles — don't appear in the top 14.

That doesn't mean they aren't important. It means something more subtle: they're assumed, not differentiated.

When every candidate for a software engineering role knows Python, listing Python in the job requirements doesn't help an employer distinguish between applicants. The skills that actually appear in job postings are the ones employers feel they need to explicitly ask for — the ones they can't take for granted.

Communication is at the top of that list because most technical candidates don't emphasize it, and most employers desperately need it.

The seniority signal

The top of the skills table reads less like a technical requirements document and more like a description of senior engineering work:

• Communication (137) — explaining architecture decisions, writing design documents, presenting to leadership, translating technical trade-offs for business stakeholders
• Leadership (72) — mentoring, technical direction, team coordination, driving alignment across groups
• Organization (80) — project management, prioritization, timeline estimation, managing competing priorities
• Collaboration (52) — cross-team projects, product partnerships, stakeholder management

These are the skills that determine whether someone operates as an individual contributor or as a technical leader. The data suggests employers are explicitly looking for them — and finding them harder to hire for than raw technical ability.

Why communication sits at the top

There are at least three forces pushing communication to the top of employer wish lists:

Distributed teams. Remote and hybrid work means more written communication — Slack messages, design documents, async decision-making. Engineers who can write clearly are disproportionately effective in distributed environments.

Cross-functional collaboration. Modern product development requires engineers to work directly with product managers, designers, data scientists, and business stakeholders. The ability to explain technical constraints in non-technical language is a genuine competitive advantage.

Seniority expectations. As engineers advance from mid-level to senior to staff, their job shifts from writing code to making decisions and building consensus. The data reflects this: employers listing senior roles are explicitly asking for the coordination skills that define technical leadership.

What this means for your career

If you're an engineer wondering why you aren't landing senior roles despite strong technical skills, the answer might not be in your GitHub profile. It might be in how you communicate about your work.

The engineers who advance fastest tend to be the ones who can:

1. Write clearly — design documents, incident reports, technical specifications that non-engineers can follow
2. Present persuasively — architecture reviews, sprint demos, stakeholder updates that drive decisions
3. Collaborate visibly — cross-team projects where your coordination is as valuable as your code
4. Lead without authority — influencing decisions, building consensus, driving alignment across teams that don't report to you

None of these require writing more code. All of them require communicating better about the code you've already written.

The resume gap

This finding also explains a common frustration with job search tools. Most resume matchers compare technical keywords: Python, React, Kubernetes, AWS. They miss the signal that employers are actually asking for.

When communication appears in more job postings than any single technical skill, and your resume doesn't describe how you communicate — not just what you build — there's a mismatch between what employers want and what your resume shows.

This is one of the reasons Seeker analyzes the full shape of your experience rather than just extracting keywords. Technical skills matter, but they're only part of the picture.

---

Curious how your own experience compares?

Upload your resume and see where your skills fit across thousands of live opportunities.

See where you fit →

---

Methodology

This analysis is based on skill extraction from the 5,000 most recently indexed technical job postings in Seeker's job corpus, collected between May and June 2026. Skills were extracted from structured job listing data. Generic job description language (benefits, compensation, team descriptions) was filtered before aggregation. Pipeline count reflects 5,459 career analyses performed through Seeker during the same period. All statistics are aggregate and anonymized. No personally identifiable information is included in this research.